No. 38 Weekly E-News of the National Front 23rd January 2010
“The electors of Millwall did not back a post modernist rightist party, but what they perceived to be a strong, disciplined organisation with the ability to back up its slogan "Defend Rights for Whites" with well-directed boots and fists.” Nick Griffin (1993)
Revisionism And Opportunism On The Islam And Israel Questions:
Old Terms, New Meanings In The Fight Against 'Cleanskins', 'Mainstreaming' And 'Media Friendly' Myths by Jim Saleam and another of the Australia First Party(some aspesct of this are not specifically NF policy, but we are reprinting this as it adds to a sensible debate about the overall strategy of White Nationalism)
In the old communist movement the terms revisionism and opportunism were expressions of particular insult. A revisionist was someone who stripped away from communism its essential radical impulse in a sea of words about social change; an opportunist was someone who was looking for a line of approach that would vault the party into some sort of position inside the capitalist state without really challenging it, and whilst acceding to its norms.
In our nationalist movement these terms are also useful, because on Stormfront Downunder and in other places, persons have emerged with versions of the nationalist message which they say are publicly marketable and media-friendly, more sensible ways to discuss older policies. Not only that, they say they have identified new methods to advance us from the margins in rapid time. I shall deal with one set of falsehoods here.
Before I enter into the discussion of our Australian case, let us look at a European example which really ties it all together. Once upon a time in the early 1990s the old man of Italian Nationalism, Giorgio Almirante, General Secretary of the Italian Social Movement (MSI), anointed his private secretary, Gianfranco Fini, to take charge of the party when he was gone. Fini told the Italian nationalists that he would take their party into the mainstream. He told them that the media regarded them to that point as a large fringe party, but an extremist party nonetheless. He said he would fix that by doing away with any policy that jarred, that was not electorally marketable, or nostalgic for the 'radicalism' of earlier days. He changed the name of the party to the National Alliance and won a swathe of votes in 1993. This fifteen per cent vote put Fini in the Berlusconi coalition government. Within six months of founding this party, a wise older man called Pino Rauti walked out, saying that Fini's initial compromises or verbal twists were just the start, that he would end up a system man in system alliances, that he would rip the guts out of Italian nationalism, permanently. He went back to found the MSI. Needless to say, Fini denounced him as unresponsive to the needs of the electorate, a wild man with wild ideas. Of course, Rauti was right, and not too long passed before Fini was all in favour of NATO and Israel and ultimately - giving immigrants the right to vote in Italian government elections; he also (quite naturally) favoured sending Italian troops to Iraq for the war on terrorism and he took the road to Jerusalem, bowing to Israeli propaganda and their demands for assurances that there was no anti Zionism in the National Alliance. Fini oversaw the job cuts of Berlusconi and made himself into another version of Italian conservatism. After waiting too long in the National Alliance, Allessandra Mussolini also quit - and founded her own electoral league and an umbrella group - 'Social Alliance' - which united the few parties of real Italian nationalism in a broad front.
I have a taste for ironies. It was Eduard Bernstein who was the private secretary for Frederick Engels, and who was anointed by Engels to carry on his work and that of Karl Marx; yet he was the very man who went on to create revisionism inside the communist movement. It seems one can't trust private secretaries!
Our revisionists and opportunists would deny that that is what they are. Let us have a look at what they say and wish to do.
The charge against nationalist politics has come in from the side. Rather than attack fundamental principles head on, they have raised up the question of Islam as the main enemy. This leads them to court allies where they can, or to neuter anything that gets in the way of this focus. When I say that they have made Islam the main enemy, I say that they see it as a line of least resistance. It is easier (sic) to tackle that question, they reason, because one can get a sort of hearing from people in the current climate. It means they can appear popular. So clever!
The present regime has allowed people to give vent to a muted criticism of an alien immigrant group and of alien cultural values. Did not Peter Costello talk about alien groups and alien values? During the time of the fake War on Terror, the government is quite happy to allow people to blow off a little steam in criticism of mad imams and terrorists. The opportunists can also get a hearing from right wing Christians and some supporters of the Liberal Party and try to set up alliances. The hard issue of Australia's place near Asia can be put aside on the grounds that they will awaken these anti Moslem masses slowly to the enemy of multiculturalism and they can pretend that they are part of a mass movement of concerned citizens.
If one criticises this anti-Islamism as something that leads nowhere but into a straight-jacketing bond, the nationalist runs the risk of being denounced as not being part of the community's concerns and of being pro-Moslem in some manner or other! Necessarily too, the anti-Islamics ignore the Zionist question and say that the electorate and the people generally have no interest in it, don't understand it and may even perceive Israel as a friend in the war on terror and our defence against Islam. Rather than sort a way through this minefield, they take the line of least resistance. Therein lays real poison.
To be a cleanskin, a mainstreamer and media-friendly, one cannot be seen be have views that 'jar' with people. The revisionists and opportunists then note that anti Zionism is 'dangerous' and the media will on occasion claim that people who espouse it might be neo-Nazis. Again, the line of least resistance. Of course, as these people retreat from the hard question, they might make a bit of noise about Zionism being another internationalist ideology or so on, but not a real issue in our local politics. By a bit of quick mouthing, they escape from the discussion. They appear to be nationalist, but following a tactically wiser line. On the contrary, they have sold out on principles and must know it. For some who may still think themselves 'clever', they will end up where they don't want to go. The communists used to say that was "using the red flag to defeat the red flag". In other words, homage (verbally) is paid to principles, whilst they go the other way.
I have said from the start that anti-Islamism leads back to the Liberal Party. There are many ways to vent our concerns about Islamic religion and culture within the present multiculti system, without falling into the trap. I have seen this anti Islamist current grow stronger and it is now an excuse to throw out nationalist analysis of foreign policy issues and understanding of the state power. I note that in Europe Le Pen has argued against the War On Terror. He says that ultimately Europe must seek accords with the Moslem world in order to reverse the tide of immigration. He says that we therefore have no business attacking Moslem countries. He says that the main internal enemy is the regime and not the Islamic immigrants as much as he criticises their presence.. Le Pen, like the NPD, the Swedish National Democrats and others, has located the neo-con group in America and elsewhere, that new Zionist lobby, as the present engine of war. That being so, there is a Zionist question which cannot be escaped by semantics. The two questions are inter-related. Those who pursue the anti Islamic line internally end up supporting it as foreign policy. We shall do neither. But keep balance and keep it publicly as well. Once anti Zionism is repudiated, one can drift about and if the War On Terror is 'popular' in some imagined way, then the Liberal Party has a new satellite. The Liberals are good at that, for once long ago, they had an army of good anti communists who disliked the Soviet regime so much, and they would serve as useful political cannon fodder. Nationalists will become no one's satellite.
I remind again: Italian nationalism could have been destroyed by the slick Fini. It hasn't been - because wiser counsels took the proper course. So it will be in Australia. (…and so it will be in Britain! –NF News Editor)
Old Terms, New Meanings In The Fight Against 'Cleanskins', 'Mainstreaming' And 'Media Friendly' Myths by Jim Saleam and another of the Australia First Party(some aspesct of this are not specifically NF policy, but we are reprinting this as it adds to a sensible debate about the overall strategy of White Nationalism)
In the old communist movement the terms revisionism and opportunism were expressions of particular insult. A revisionist was someone who stripped away from communism its essential radical impulse in a sea of words about social change; an opportunist was someone who was looking for a line of approach that would vault the party into some sort of position inside the capitalist state without really challenging it, and whilst acceding to its norms.
In our nationalist movement these terms are also useful, because on Stormfront Downunder and in other places, persons have emerged with versions of the nationalist message which they say are publicly marketable and media-friendly, more sensible ways to discuss older policies. Not only that, they say they have identified new methods to advance us from the margins in rapid time. I shall deal with one set of falsehoods here.
Before I enter into the discussion of our Australian case, let us look at a European example which really ties it all together. Once upon a time in the early 1990s the old man of Italian Nationalism, Giorgio Almirante, General Secretary of the Italian Social Movement (MSI), anointed his private secretary, Gianfranco Fini, to take charge of the party when he was gone. Fini told the Italian nationalists that he would take their party into the mainstream. He told them that the media regarded them to that point as a large fringe party, but an extremist party nonetheless. He said he would fix that by doing away with any policy that jarred, that was not electorally marketable, or nostalgic for the 'radicalism' of earlier days. He changed the name of the party to the National Alliance and won a swathe of votes in 1993. This fifteen per cent vote put Fini in the Berlusconi coalition government. Within six months of founding this party, a wise older man called Pino Rauti walked out, saying that Fini's initial compromises or verbal twists were just the start, that he would end up a system man in system alliances, that he would rip the guts out of Italian nationalism, permanently. He went back to found the MSI. Needless to say, Fini denounced him as unresponsive to the needs of the electorate, a wild man with wild ideas. Of course, Rauti was right, and not too long passed before Fini was all in favour of NATO and Israel and ultimately - giving immigrants the right to vote in Italian government elections; he also (quite naturally) favoured sending Italian troops to Iraq for the war on terrorism and he took the road to Jerusalem, bowing to Israeli propaganda and their demands for assurances that there was no anti Zionism in the National Alliance. Fini oversaw the job cuts of Berlusconi and made himself into another version of Italian conservatism. After waiting too long in the National Alliance, Allessandra Mussolini also quit - and founded her own electoral league and an umbrella group - 'Social Alliance' - which united the few parties of real Italian nationalism in a broad front.
I have a taste for ironies. It was Eduard Bernstein who was the private secretary for Frederick Engels, and who was anointed by Engels to carry on his work and that of Karl Marx; yet he was the very man who went on to create revisionism inside the communist movement. It seems one can't trust private secretaries!
Our revisionists and opportunists would deny that that is what they are. Let us have a look at what they say and wish to do.
The charge against nationalist politics has come in from the side. Rather than attack fundamental principles head on, they have raised up the question of Islam as the main enemy. This leads them to court allies where they can, or to neuter anything that gets in the way of this focus. When I say that they have made Islam the main enemy, I say that they see it as a line of least resistance. It is easier (sic) to tackle that question, they reason, because one can get a sort of hearing from people in the current climate. It means they can appear popular. So clever!
The present regime has allowed people to give vent to a muted criticism of an alien immigrant group and of alien cultural values. Did not Peter Costello talk about alien groups and alien values? During the time of the fake War on Terror, the government is quite happy to allow people to blow off a little steam in criticism of mad imams and terrorists. The opportunists can also get a hearing from right wing Christians and some supporters of the Liberal Party and try to set up alliances. The hard issue of Australia's place near Asia can be put aside on the grounds that they will awaken these anti Moslem masses slowly to the enemy of multiculturalism and they can pretend that they are part of a mass movement of concerned citizens.
If one criticises this anti-Islamism as something that leads nowhere but into a straight-jacketing bond, the nationalist runs the risk of being denounced as not being part of the community's concerns and of being pro-Moslem in some manner or other! Necessarily too, the anti-Islamics ignore the Zionist question and say that the electorate and the people generally have no interest in it, don't understand it and may even perceive Israel as a friend in the war on terror and our defence against Islam. Rather than sort a way through this minefield, they take the line of least resistance. Therein lays real poison.
To be a cleanskin, a mainstreamer and media-friendly, one cannot be seen be have views that 'jar' with people. The revisionists and opportunists then note that anti Zionism is 'dangerous' and the media will on occasion claim that people who espouse it might be neo-Nazis. Again, the line of least resistance. Of course, as these people retreat from the hard question, they might make a bit of noise about Zionism being another internationalist ideology or so on, but not a real issue in our local politics. By a bit of quick mouthing, they escape from the discussion. They appear to be nationalist, but following a tactically wiser line. On the contrary, they have sold out on principles and must know it. For some who may still think themselves 'clever', they will end up where they don't want to go. The communists used to say that was "using the red flag to defeat the red flag". In other words, homage (verbally) is paid to principles, whilst they go the other way.
I have said from the start that anti-Islamism leads back to the Liberal Party. There are many ways to vent our concerns about Islamic religion and culture within the present multiculti system, without falling into the trap. I have seen this anti Islamist current grow stronger and it is now an excuse to throw out nationalist analysis of foreign policy issues and understanding of the state power. I note that in Europe Le Pen has argued against the War On Terror. He says that ultimately Europe must seek accords with the Moslem world in order to reverse the tide of immigration. He says that we therefore have no business attacking Moslem countries. He says that the main internal enemy is the regime and not the Islamic immigrants as much as he criticises their presence.. Le Pen, like the NPD, the Swedish National Democrats and others, has located the neo-con group in America and elsewhere, that new Zionist lobby, as the present engine of war. That being so, there is a Zionist question which cannot be escaped by semantics. The two questions are inter-related. Those who pursue the anti Islamic line internally end up supporting it as foreign policy. We shall do neither. But keep balance and keep it publicly as well. Once anti Zionism is repudiated, one can drift about and if the War On Terror is 'popular' in some imagined way, then the Liberal Party has a new satellite. The Liberals are good at that, for once long ago, they had an army of good anti communists who disliked the Soviet regime so much, and they would serve as useful political cannon fodder. Nationalists will become no one's satellite.
I remind again: Italian nationalism could have been destroyed by the slick Fini. It hasn't been - because wiser counsels took the proper course. So it will be in Australia. (…and so it will be in Britain! –NF News Editor)
FREEDOM-FREEDOM-FREEDOM
There are Nationalists locked up for talking, for thinking, for saying the word NO, British citizens who have had enough of the Westminster snouts in the same trough and dare to say so.
There are telephone taps, email intercepts, state spies, mobile text trawling, landlords threatened by the police to stop meetings taking place, police harassment on activity days state sponsored violence against us - in fact the same tactics we taught Mugabe.
And guess what we are still growing as a movement, enquiries are on the up and we are going places, this is OUR time, our moment in time.
National Front policy on Freedom
For the last thousand years the British people have fought, and sometimes died, to preserve our basic freedoms.
The National Front wholeheartedly believes that these freedoms must be maintained.
Consequently the National Front believes in the introduction of a bill of rights to guarantee basic freedoms including:
Equal and free access to justice
Freedom of speech and publication and distribution of printed matter
Freedom of access to publicly owned assembly facilities
Freedom for orderly demonstrations in public
The right to vote and stand for election for public office without onerous financial or other qualifications
Freedom from arbitrary arrest
Equal and free access to justice
Freedom of speech and publication and distribution of printed matter
Freedom of access to publicly owned assembly facilities
Freedom for orderly demonstrations in public
The right to vote and stand for election for public office without onerous financial or other qualifications
Freedom from arbitrary arrest
Tom Linden (NF Press and Publicity)
INTERESTING TRIVIA #1345 in a series of 1
Alaska miners take heed---where there be griffins, there may be gold. At least that's what ancient Mediterranean and Asian cultures believed, and some recent evidence may explain why.
INTERESTING TRIVIA #1345 in a series of 1
Alaska miners take heed---where there be griffins, there may be gold. At least that's what ancient Mediterranean and Asian cultures believed, and some recent evidence may explain why.
In the November/December 1994 issue of Archaeology, folklorist Adrienne Mayor explains how the griffin, a mythological creature with the body of a lion and the head and wings of an eagle, was thought by ancient prospectors to be a guardian of placer gold deposits.
In detailing her research on ancient cultures, Mayor said she was surprised by the many references to griffins. In written anecdotes and in griffin likenesses on pottery and bronze reliefs, she noticed several similarities---all the griffins had four legs and a beak, and their nests often contained gold.
AUSTRALIA FIRST PARTY FORMS OFFICIAL LINKS WITH NATIONAL FRONT
The Australia First Party(NSW), a radical racial-nationalist party which, like the NF condemns the trendy post modernist direction of some right wing groups, has formed official links with the NF. Its Leader, James Saleam has been in contact with leading NF members and mutual exchange of information and materials has been agreed as well both parties aiding each other in whatever way possible to further the cause of ‘White Pride Worldwide”. The Australia First site is at http://ausfirst.alphalink.com.au
KRISS DONALD MEMORIAL RALLY GLASGOW 21st March 2010
The date of this march and rally has now been changed to the weekend of the 29 th/21 st. Top NF speakers have bee invited to attend.
NATIONAL FRONT GENERAL ELECTION FUND – URGENT APPEAL!!!!
The National Front wants to stand as many candidates as possible in the General Election expected in May or June this year. (The feeling is Brown will leave it until June which is the latest date this political toad can hang on to his fragile power). The NF aims to stand candidates in Hull, Leeds, Bradford, Lancs, West Midlands, Newcastle, East Midlands, London and the South-East. All this will depend on cash. The bare minimum per candidate including £500 deposit is around £1000 and donations to the NF General Election fund are URGENTLY need now.
Send whatever you can to:-
The Secretary
PO Box 114, Solihull,
West Midlands, B91 2UR.
0121 2466838
07950 474 625 (Make Cheques/PO’s out to “National Front”)
The Secretary
PO Box 114, Solihull,
West Midlands, B91 2UR.
0121 2466838
07950 474 625 (Make Cheques/PO’s out to “National Front”)
SWINDON NATIONAL FRONT 27th January 2010
Remember the Holocaust!
Swindon National Front will be holding a Remembrance Day activity for
the ten's of millions of victims of the World Communist Holocaust
This looks like being a big event so please make every effort to support it!
The victims of Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and other Communist murderers must NEVER
be forgotten!
Contact Mike at Swindon NF on: 07890802883 swindonnf@yahoo.co.uk
NATIONAL FRONT MAJOR LONDON MEETING 21 st FEBRUARY 2010
Things look on course for a MAJOR London on Sunday 21 st February. The NF is looking forward to a very, very big turnout in the light of recent and not too distant changes in the Nationalist scene (there will be a recruitment desk manned all through the rally!). Main speakers (to be confirmed) are Tom Sunic and Norman Lowell, backed up by leading NF speakers. This is going to be a keynote rally of 2010. (Entrance fee £6 includes buffet)
Things look on course for a MAJOR London on Sunday 21 st February. The NF is looking forward to a very, very big turnout in the light of recent and not too distant changes in the Nationalist scene (there will be a recruitment desk manned all through the rally!). Main speakers (to be confirmed) are Tom Sunic and Norman Lowell, backed up by leading NF speakers. This is going to be a keynote rally of 2010. (Entrance fee £6 includes buffet)
NATIONAL FRONT NORTH-EAST
NF North-East will be holding a big meeting EVERY month. The main speaker for the January meeting – Sunday 24th January - is Eddy Morrison. Full details from Regional Organiser, Simon Biggs on 07017 410522.
NF SCOTLAND MEETING FEBRUARY 2010
There will be a major meeting of the Scottish National Front in February. The date is now confirmed as Sunday 14 th February. For details contact nfscotland@yahoo.com or phone - 07826 577635. Just as in Ulster and Wales, NF Scotland is on the move!
NF BRADFORD MEETING – Sunday 31 st January
Bradford National Front have their first meeting of 2010 arranged for Sunday 31 st January. Speakers include Tom Linden (Yorkshire NF organiser). Eddy Morrison (NF information Dept), Dr. Jim Lewthwaite (Bradford NF), Andy Gray (Northants NF) and Steve Smith (Burnley NF).
For details contact National Front Bradford Contact line: 07939795553 bradfordnationalfront@yahoo.co.uk
There will be a major meeting of the Scottish National Front in February. The date is now confirmed as Sunday 14 th February. For details contact nfscotland@yahoo.com or phone - 07826 577635. Just as in Ulster and Wales, NF Scotland is on the move!
NF BRADFORD MEETING – Sunday 31 st January
Bradford National Front have their first meeting of 2010 arranged for Sunday 31 st January. Speakers include Tom Linden (Yorkshire NF organiser). Eddy Morrison (NF information Dept), Dr. Jim Lewthwaite (Bradford NF), Andy Gray (Northants NF) and Steve Smith (Burnley NF).
For details contact National Front Bradford Contact line: 07939795553 bradfordnationalfront@yahoo.co.uk
NATIONAL FRONT MEMBER!
Have YOU renewed your Annual Membership Subscription for 2010 yet? The annual subscription is just £10 per year. Renewals are now being taken and should be sent to:-
The Secretary
PO Box 114, Solihull,
West Midlands, B91 2UR.
0121 2466838
07950 474 625
Email: westmidlandsnf@gmail.com
Renew early - 2010 Membership Cards are already going out
The National Front is the only true racial-nationalist party now in Britain.
There is no better way to fight for your Race and Nation than being a paid up member of the renascent NF. (If you pay ONLINE through PayPal, there is an extra £1 charge to cover administration and PayPal fee – join online HERE)
The Secretary
PO Box 114, Solihull,
West Midlands, B91 2UR.
0121 2466838
07950 474 625
Email: westmidlandsnf@gmail.com
Renew early - 2010 Membership Cards are already going out
The National Front is the only true racial-nationalist party now in Britain.
There is no better way to fight for your Race and Nation than being a paid up member of the renascent NF. (If you pay ONLINE through PayPal, there is an extra £1 charge to cover administration and PayPal fee – join online HERE)
“BRITAIN FIRST” No.8 January 2010 issue OUT NOW!
Eight news and views packed pages 50p per copy
Annual Subscription £12.00 incl postage
Bulk rates now available for first time (50 copies or over – postage extra – email for quote)
Sample Issue £1.00 incl postage
10 copies £4.00 incl postage
Sample Issue £1.00 incl postage
10 copies £4.00 incl postage
20 copies £7.00 incl postage
50 copies £15.00 incl postage
Order from
Britain First
PO Box 282
Leeds
LS16 OEA
Please make Cheque/PO to "Britain First"
For fuller details click HERE
Britain First
PO Box 282
Leeds
LS16 OEA
Please make Cheque/PO to "Britain First"
For fuller details click HERE
National Front News is produced by the National Publicity Department of the NF. Copyright 2009. NF News may be reprinted as long as no part is altered and the whole publication is reproduced in total.
NF News can be contacted at nfnews@ntlworld.com Editor – Nice Guy Eddy.
To subscribe send Email with word “Subscribe Me Now!” as the heading. To unsubscribe send Email with unsubscribe as heading. Editors personal Blog - http://britishnationalist14.blogspot.com/
Žádné komentáře:
Okomentovat